Arthur v. Colorado

380 U.S. 250, 13 L. Ed. 2d 818, 85 S. Ct. 943, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1669
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 8, 1965·No. 486, Misc·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur v. Colorado, 380 U.S. 250, 13 L. Ed. 2d 818, 85 S. Ct. 943, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1669 (1965).

380 U.S. 250 (Arthur v. Colorado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'n
589 A.2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Arthur v. People
437 P.2d 41 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1968)
Ex Parte Williams
420 S.W.2d 931 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
People v. Parshay
148 N.W.2d 869 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1967)
Subilosky v. Commonwealth
209 N.E.2d 316 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)