Arthur J. Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

180 F. App'x 902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 2006
Docket05-13985
StatusUnpublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 180 F. App'x 902 (Arthur J. Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur J. Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 180 F. App'x 902 (11th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur J. Williams appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). After review and oral argument, we vacate and remand.

In a previous remand order, the Appeals Council directed the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to supplement the record with Williams’s Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) medical records. The ALJ complied with the order and requested the records, but apparently the records sent to the ALJ did not include the VA’s Rating Decision, which found Williams disabled under the VA’s disability framework. It is undisputed that the ALJ did not reference or address the Rating Decision in its June 6, 2002 decision.

Thus, on remand Williams shall be allowed to supplement the record before the ALJ with the VA’s Rating Decision. The ALJ then shall review Williams’s claim again and specifically address in its decision the VA’s Rating Decision. While we recognize that the ALJ’s prior decision addressed at some length Williams’s VA medical evidence, nonetheless, in its decision the ALJ should specifically also consider and address the VA’s Rating Decision itself.

Nothing here shall be construed as bearing on the ultimate outcome on remand as to whether Williams is or is not disabled and entitled to benefits.

In conclusion, we vacate the district court’s order dated May 20, 2005 and remand this case with instructions that it be returned to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F. App'x 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-j-williams-v-jo-anne-b-barnhart-ca11-2006.