Art-Tex Petroleum, Inc. v. New York State Department of Audit

248 A.D.2d 901, 670 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2811
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 901 (Art-Tex Petroleum, Inc. v. New York State Department of Audit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Art-Tex Petroleum, Inc. v. New York State Department of Audit, 248 A.D.2d 901, 670 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Mikoll, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered July 30, 1997 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted a motion by respondent Department of Audit and Control to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner sought to nullify and vacate a notice of environmental lien filed by respondent Department of Audit and Control against petitioner’s property pursuant to Navigation Law § 181-a. Supreme Court determined that a CPLR article 78 proceeding was an improper form of relief and dismissed the proceeding.

Petitioner is an owner of real property located in the Town of Hopewell Junction, Dutchess County. A gas station was located therein which was leased to respondent Emporium Oil Terminal, Inc., who assigned its rights under the lease to respondent Dutchess Oil, Inc. The Department of Environmental Conservation notified petitioner of contamination from petroleum on the property and directed petitioner to clean up and [902]*902contain the leak within five days. A demand for payment was mailed to petitioner in December 1995 and an environmental lien was placed on the property totaling $143,357.05. Petitioner commenced the instant proceeding.

Dismissal of this proceeding is appropriate in that petitioner, as owner of the contaminated property, is a discharger based on Navigation Law § 181 (1) liability. Further, inasmuch as petitioner failed to comply with the provisions of Lien Law § 59, which provides the means for vacating a lien, the petition was appropriately dismissed.

Crew III, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Green
271 A.D.2d 11 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 901, 670 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/art-tex-petroleum-inc-v-new-york-state-department-of-audit-nyappdiv-1998.