Arnold v. State
282 S.W.3d 390, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 378, 2009 WL 744280
Opinion
Order
Damon Arnold appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding *391 of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. State, 282 S.W.3d 390, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 378, 2009 WL 744280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 390 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. Kelly
282 S.W.3d 390 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)