Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Arnold v. State

Arnold v. State

572 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218, 1991 WL 2745
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arnold v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 37 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 1991·No. No. 89-1132·Published

Opinions

LETTS, Judge.

We reverse and remand for a new trial. The reasons given by the prosecutor to justify the exercise of the peremptory challenge of a black juror are not supported anywhere in the record. See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984); Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, J., concurs. WARNER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. State, 572 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218, 1991 WL 2745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

572 So. 2d 1026 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Baird
572 So. 2d 904 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Neil
457 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Floyd v. State
569 So. 2d 1225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Harris v. State
544 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)