Arnold v. State
572 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218, 1991 WL 2745
This text of 572 So. 2d 1026 (Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arnold v. State, 572 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218, 1991 WL 2745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinions
We reverse and remand for a new trial. The reasons given by the prosecutor to justify the exercise of the peremptory challenge of a black juror are not supported anywhere in the record. See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984); Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Baird
572 So. 2d 904 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Neil
457 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Floyd v. State
569 So. 2d 1225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Harris v. State
544 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 1026, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218, 1991 WL 2745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.