Arnold v. Randall
This text of 102 N.W. 340 (Arnold v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only cause of action stated in the complaint is predicated upon the existence and breach of an agreement by Randall to pay to the mortgagee the amount of his debt, and therefore must fail because, in another action between the same parties, and upon the same evidence (Arnold, v. Randall, 121 Wis. 462, 98 N. W. 239), it was finally adjudicated that no such promise was made, which is, therefore, res adjudícala and conclusive in this action. Grunert v. Spalding, 104 Wis. 193, 220, 80 N. W. 589.
By live Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.W. 340, 124 Wis. 1, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-randall-wis-1905.