Arnold v. Randall

102 N.W. 340, 124 Wis. 1, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 52
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dodge, J.

The only cause of action stated in the complaint is predicated upon the existence and breach of an agreement by Randall to pay to the mortgagee the amount of his debt, and therefore must fail because, in another action between the same parties, and upon the same evidence (Arnold, v. Randall, 121 Wis. 462, 98 N. W. 239), it was finally adjudicated that no such promise was made, which is, therefore, res adjudícala and conclusive in this action. Grunert v. Spalding, 104 Wis. 193, 220, 80 N. W. 589.

By live Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Randall, 102 N.W. 340, 124 Wis. 1, 1905 Wisc. LEXIS 52 (Wis. 1905).

102 N.W. 340 (Arnold v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vukelic v. Upper Third Street Savings & Loan Ass'n
269 N.W. 273 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1936)