Arnold v. Hall

70 Ga. 445
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 70 Ga. 445 (Arnold v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Hall, 70 Ga. 445 (Ga. 1883).

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

1. The motion for a new trial should have been dismissed. The parties were allowed until the 3d Monday in October, 1882, to perfect the motion by making out and filing a brief of the testimony. The 3d Monday in October was the 16th of that month. Nothing was done until the 20th of the month. It was too late to perfebt the motion. 5 Ga., 333; 59 Ga., 626; Usry vs. Phillips, 68 Ga., 815; McGord vs. Harden, ex'r, 69 Ga., 747; 65 Ga., 20.

[447]*4472. No consent of counsel will- be enforced unless in writing. The consent was in parol and disputed. The court could not enforce it legally, but was bound by the rule. 20 Rule Superior Court; Code, §204.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans & Pennington v. Nail
66 S.E. 543 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. Strickland
41 S.E. 501 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Herz v. Frank & Adler
30 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Anderson v. McLean & Co.
22 S.E. 302 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Moxley v. Kinloch
7 S.E. 123 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
Dickinson v. Mann
74 Ga. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Ga. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-hall-ga-1883.