Arnold v. Cochran

154 So. 2d 692, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2777
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 21, 1963·No. No. 31849·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter recurs for consideration upon the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, Arnold v. Director, Florida Division of Corrections, 372 U.S. 769, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Ed.2d 140. Pursuant to the directions of that court it is now found that the petition, if proved, alleges grounds for post-conviction relief. In order to expedite the disposition of the matter, we decline to issue a writ of habeas corpus, but expressly without prejudice to the petitioner to proceed [693]*693under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, 31 F.S.A. See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, and on remand, Gideon v. Wainwright, (Fla.) 153 So.2d 299, opinion filed May 15, 1963.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and HOBSON (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Cochran, 154 So. 2d 692, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2777 (Fla. 1963).

154 So. 2d 692 (Arnold v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Gideon v. Wainwright
153 So. 2d 299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)
Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Arnold v. Director, Florida Division of Corrections
372 U.S. 769 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Patterson v. City of Newport News
372 U.S. 771 (Supreme Court, 1963)