Arnold v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida

Arnold v. Cochran

145 So. 2d 478

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 10, 1962·No. No. 31849·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was submitted to the court upon the return of the respondent to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein and petitioner’s reply thereto. The record reveals that the petitioner has previously [479]*479attacked the judgment and sentence here under assault and that said judgment and sentence was per curiam affirmed. (Arnold v. State, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 644) Upon consideration of all the documents and exhibits filed in the instant habeas corpus proceedings, it is ordered that the writ heretofore issued be discharged, and that petitioner be and he is hereby remanded to the custody of the respondent.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was submitted to the court upon the return of the respondent to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein and petitioner’s reply thereto. The record reveals that the petitioner has previously [479]*479attacked the judgment and sentence here under assault and that said judgment and sentence was per curiam affirmed. (Arnold v. State, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 644) Upon consideration of all the documents and exhibits filed in the instant habeas corpus proceedings, it is ordered that the writ heretofore issued be discharged, and that petitioner be and he is hereby remanded to the custody of the respondent.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Arnold v. Cochran, 145 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1962).

Pincite

145 So. 2d 478 (Arnold v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related