Arnold v. Cochran

145 So. 2d 478
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1962
DocketNo. 31849
StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 2d 478 (Arnold v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arnold v. Cochran, 145 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was submitted to the court upon the return of the respondent to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein and petitioner’s reply thereto. The record reveals that the petitioner has previously [479]*479attacked the judgment and sentence here under assault and that said judgment and sentence was per curiam affirmed. (Arnold v. State, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 644) Upon consideration of all the documents and exhibits filed in the instant habeas corpus proceedings, it is ordered that the writ heretofore issued be discharged, and that petitioner be and he is hereby remanded to the custody of the respondent.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. State
141 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-v-cochran-fla-1962.