Arnold v. Boyce

124 So. 61, 98 Fla. 682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arnold v. Boyce. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Fla. 484
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 17, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the' transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Boyce, 124 So. 61, 98 Fla. 682 (Fla. 1929).

124 So. 61 (Arnold v. Boyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.