Arnold v. Boyce

121 So. 472, 97 Fla. 484

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this case an inspection of the record discloses that the writ of error was made returnable to a date more than ninety days after the date of the issuance of the writ. Therefore, the Court is without jurisdiction in the cause and the writ of error must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Wi-iiteield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Per Curiam. — Fact that Supreme Court stood in recess on date at which writ of error was applied for did not war rant making writ returnable at date more than 90 days after its issuance, since court had not adjourned and term of court is continuous from commencement thereof until beginning of succeeding term.