Arnold Tunchez v. Robert Perez
This text of Arnold Tunchez v. Robert Perez (Arnold Tunchez v. Robert Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ July 27, 2022
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A23D0003. ARNOLD TUNCHEZ v. ROBERT PEREZ.
In this adoption proceeding, the superior court issued an order terminating the parental rights of Arnold Tunchez on June 16, 2022, and Tunchez filed this application for discretionary appeal on July 19, 2022. However, we lack jurisdiction because the superior court has not yet issued an order on the underlying petition for adoption. Ordinarily, a party seeking to appeal an order terminating parental rights must file an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (12). However, where, as here, the case remains pending in the court below, the losing party is required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). The discretionary appeal statute does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Id. Because Tunchez failed to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures, we lack jurisdiction to consider this discretionary application, which is hereby DISMISSED.1 See In the Interest of M. K. C., 166 Ga. App. 261, 261 (304 SE2d 430) (1983).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/27/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
1 We note that even if the order at issue was final, Tunchez’s discretionary application would be untimely because it was not filed within 30 days of the entry of the order. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arnold Tunchez v. Robert Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnold-tunchez-v-robert-perez-gactapp-2022.