Arnett v. State

8 S.W.3d 34, 340 Ark. 198, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 17
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 20, 2000·No. CR 99-1442·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

Carolyn Arnett, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, Herbert T. Wright, Jr., admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnett v. State, 8 S.W.3d 34, 340 Ark. 198, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 17 (Ark. 2000).

8 S.W.3d 34 (Arnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related