Arnett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Arnett v. State

8 S.W.3d 34, 340 Ark. 198, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 17

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 20, 2000

DocketCR 99-1442

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 S.W.3d 34 (Arnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnett v. State, 8 S.W.3d 34, 340 Ark. 198, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 17 (Ark. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Curiam.

Carolyn Arnett, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, Herbert T. Wright, Jr., admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI