Armstrong v. Stein
This text of 634 So. 2d 845 (Armstrong v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Deborah ARMSTRONG, Mother of and Erin Armstrong
v.
Maureen STEIN, M.D. and Felix G. Rabito, M.D.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
The application is granted. The judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiff's petition on an exception of no cause of action was a final and appealable judgment. The application for supervisory writs to the court of appeal should have been treated as a timely appeal. We accordingly grant plaintiff's application to this court and remand the matter to the court of appeal to docket as an appeal, if the application for supervisory *846 writs was timely for an appeal. Otherwise, the application is denied.
DENNIS, J., not on panel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 So. 2d 845, 1994 WL 89827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-stein-la-1994.