Armstrong v. State

923 So. 2d 1252, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4239, 2006 WL 740934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 846 So. 2d 1227
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2006·No. No. 2D04-1965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Virginia Armstrong’s conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone. See §§ 893.03(c); .135(l)(c)(l), (6), Fla. Stat. (2002). We strike the $150 cost imposed for “CFF” because the circuit court did not cite any statutory authority for this cost. See Cruz v. State, 830 So.2d 892 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2002). Armstrong preserved this issue by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The circuit court did not rule on her motion within sixty days, so it is deemed denied. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B).

Conviction affirmed, cost stricken.

NORTHCUTT, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 923 So. 2d 1252, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4239, 2006 WL 740934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

923 So. 2d 1252 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. State
830 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)