Armstrong v. State

880 So. 2d 792, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11482, 2004 WL 1662207
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-2199
StatusPublished

This text of 880 So. 2d 792 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. State, 880 So. 2d 792, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11482, 2004 WL 1662207 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 So. 2d 792, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11482, 2004 WL 1662207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.