Armstrong v. Knight
674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 134, 2009 WL 426105
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
Docket501P06-4
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 674 S.E.2d 679 (Armstrong v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armstrong v. Knight, 674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 134, 2009 WL 426105 (N.C. 2009).
Opinion
ARMSTRONG
v.
KNIGHT.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Thomasine E. Moore, Jacksonville, for Knight.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of February 2009 by Plaintiff for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus:
"Motion Dismissed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 0th day of *bad date* 0 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of February 2009."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edmunds v. Edmunds
674 S.E.2d 679 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 134, 2009 WL 426105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-knight-nc-2009.