Armstrong v. DeBois

Eighth Circuit

Armstrong v. DeBois

1 F. App'x 558

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 5, 2001·No. No. 00-2582·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against private-party defendant Barbara Debois. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against private-party defendant Barbara Debois. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

Footnotes

Armstrong v. DeBois, 1 F. App'x 558 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

1 F. App'x 558 (Armstrong v. DeBois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related