Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff

146 S.E. 692, 149 S.C. 187, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 77
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 8, 1929·No. 12582·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Blease.

This case is controlled by the case of Xepapas et al., Petitioners, v. Richardson, Chief Constable, et al., Respondents. 146 S. E., 686, the opinion in which is filed herewith.

It is the judgment of this Court that the petitioners are entitled to an order of injunction restraining and enjoining the defendants from attempting to enforce the provisions of Sections 714 and 717 of the Criminal Code, as_prayed for in their petition, and such order will issue.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts and Mr. Justice Stabeer concur. Messrs. Justices Coti-iran and Carter concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff, 146 S.E. 692, 149 S.C. 187, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 77 (S.C. 1929).

146 S.E. 692 (Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Xepapas v. Richardson
146 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)