Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff

146 S.E. 692, 149 S.C. 187, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 77
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 8, 1929
Docket12582
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 692 (Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong Pharmacy v. Rector, Sheriff, 146 S.E. 692, 149 S.C. 187, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 77 (S.C. 1929).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Blease.

This case is controlled by the case of Xepapas et al., Petitioners, v. Richardson, Chief Constable, et al., Respondents. 146 S. E., 686, the opinion in which is filed herewith.

It is the judgment of this Court that the petitioners are entitled to an order of injunction restraining and enjoining the defendants from attempting to enforce the provisions of Sections 714 and 717 of the Criminal Code, as_prayed for in their petition, and such order will issue.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts and Mr. Justice Stabeer concur. Messrs. Justices Coti-iran and Carter concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Xepapas v. Richardson
146 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 692, 149 S.C. 187, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-pharmacy-v-rector-sheriff-sc-1929.