Aric Knox v. Ron Ward

Tenth Circuit

Aric Knox v. Ron Ward

105 F.3d 1336, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077, 1997 WL 51840

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 7, 1997·No. 96-6297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the certificate of appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir.1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the certificate of appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir.1996).

Aric Knox v. Ron Ward, 105 F.3d 1336, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2077, 1997 WL 51840 (10th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

105 F.3d 1336 (Aric Knox v. Ron Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related