Arenson Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Kopelman

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9/13/2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARENSON OFFICE FURNISHINGS, INC, Plaintiff, 1:20-cv-10497-MKV -against- ORDER MICHAEL KOPELMAN, Defendant. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendants informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 24]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by October 13, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. _________________________________ Date: September 13, 2021 MARY KAY VYSKOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge