Arender v. National Sales, Inc.

195 So. 2d 90, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1437
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 1967
DocketNo. 44064
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 So. 2d 90 (Arender v. National Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arender v. National Sales, Inc., 195 So. 2d 90, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1437 (Mich. 1967).

Opinion

ETHRIDGE, Chief Justice:

ON MOTIONS TO CORRECT JUDGMENT AND FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

The appellees and cross-appellants, employer and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, have filed a motion to correct judgment. The opinion on suggestion of error held that American Mutual was liable for medical expenses and temporary total disability benefits resulting from the injury of January 11, 1963. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company has paid certain medical benefits and temporary total benefits after that date. American Mutual should not be required to make payments to appellant duplicating those already made to her through error by Liberty Mutual. This was held in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Collins, 231 Miss. 319, 340, 95 So.2d 456, 463, 96 So.2d 456 (1957). Accordingly, the motion to correct judgment is sustained, and it is adjudicated that American Mutual is not obligated to make duplicate payments of compensation to appellant, for that part of medical expenses and temporary disability benefits already paid appellant by Liberty Mutual. This is without prejudice to the rights of the two insurance companies involved to determine their respective rights in an independent action.

Mrs. Arender and her attorneys have filed a motion for allowance to her attorneys of an aggregate fee of 331/$% of the amount recovered by her for all services rendered to her by her attorneys. This motion is sustained.

Motion of appellees and cross-appellants to correct judgment sustained; motion of appellant for attorneys’ fees sustained.

JONES, BRADY, INZER and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LEAKE CTY. COOP.(AAL) v. Dependents of Barrett
226 So. 2d 608 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1969)
New & Hughes Drilling Company v. Smith
219 So. 2d 657 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 So. 2d 90, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arender-v-national-sales-inc-miss-1967.