Arduino v. Borough of Dunmore
741 A.2d 195, 559 Pa. 415
This text of 741 A.2d 195 (Arduino v. Borough of Dunmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arduino v. Borough of Dunmore, 741 A.2d 195, 559 Pa. 415 (Pa. 1999).
Opinion
Esty ARDUINO, Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF DUNMORE, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Christopher P. Cullen, Dunmore, for Esty Arduino.
Robert C. Cordaro, Terrence J. McDonald, Dunmore, for Borough of Dunmore.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
Justices CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arduino v. Borough of Dunmore
741 A.2d 195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
741 A.2d 195, 559 Pa. 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arduino-v-borough-of-dunmore-pa-1999.