Architectural Models, Inc., a California Corporation v. Nils C. Neklason and Donald Nusbaum, Doing Business as Scale Models Unlimited
This text of 397 F.2d 405 (Architectural Models, Inc., a California Corporation v. Nils C. Neklason and Donald Nusbaum, Doing Business as Scale Models Unlimited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 3,137,209, issued to Virginia Green and Leila Johnston, thereafter assigned to plaintiff (Appellant) Architectural Models, Inc., resulting in a judgment for defendants (Appellees), D.C., 264 F.Supp. 312.
The complaint also contained a cause of action for unfair competition in the use of a trade secret of plaintiff by defendants. This issue was decided adversely to the plaintiff at the trial, and no appeal has been taken from this part of the judgment.
In view of the care with which the trial court approached the problem and tried the case, the oral testimony which was taken as to the entire controversy, the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony, which were entirely for decision by the trial court; and in further view *406 of the fact that the patent was a combination patent in a crowded field, we cannot say that the trial judge was clearly wrong.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 405, 158 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 583, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/architectural-models-inc-a-california-corporation-v-nils-c-neklason-ca9-1968.