Archdiocese of Miami v. Sama

519 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11426, 1987 WL 2284
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1987·No. No. 87-2307·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Courts are prohibited from resolving church property disputes on the basis of religious doctrine,” Galich v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 75 Ill.App.3d 538, 31 IJLDec. 370, 394 N.E.2d 572 (1979); see Graffam v. Wray, 437 A.2d 627, 633 (Me. 1981), when, as here, the underlying controversy concerns religious doctrine and only incidentally affects other matters. We therefore conclude that the petitioners have affirmatively demonstrated a lack of jurisdiction in the lower court. English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). We are certain that it will not be necessary to issue a formal judgment in prohibition.

Prohibition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Archdiocese of Miami v. Sama, 519 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11426, 1987 WL 2284 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

519 So. 2d 28 (Archdiocese of Miami v. Sama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

House of God v. White
792 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
City of Clearwater v. Allen's Creek Properties, Inc.
658 So. 2d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)