Archdiocese of Miami v. Sama
Opinion
Courts are prohibited from resolving church property disputes on the basis of religious doctrine,” Galich v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 75 Ill.App.3d 538, 31 IJLDec. 370, 394 N.E.2d 572 (1979); see Graffam v. Wray, 437 A.2d 627, 633 (Me. 1981), when, as here, the underlying controversy concerns religious doctrine and only incidentally affects other matters. We therefore conclude that the petitioners have affirmatively demonstrated a lack of jurisdiction in the lower court. English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). We are certain that it will not be necessary to issue a formal judgment in prohibition.
Prohibition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
519 So. 2d 28 (Archdiocese of Miami v. Sama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.