Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP
This text of Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP (Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 26a0191n.06
Nos. 23-3297, 23-3437, 23-3536, 23-3537, 23-3541, 23-3612, 23-3644, 23-3645, 23-3662
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
) APOGEE COAL COMPANY, LLC, and ARCH RESOURCES, INC. (23- ) 3297/3541/3612/3644/3645/3662); APOGEE COAL ) FILED COMPANY and ARCH COAL, INC., nka Arch ) Apr 28, 2026 Resources, Inc. (23-3437); ARCH OF KENTUCKY, ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk LLC, and ARCH RESOURCES, INC. (23- ) 3536/3537), ) Petitioners, ) ON PETITION FOR REVIEW ) OF AN ORDER OF THE v. ) BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ ) LABOR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. ) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; RUTLAND ) OPINION MELTON (23-3297); MICHAEL G. CASH (23- 3437); MARY ISON (23-3536/3537); RUSH ) CREECH (23-3541); KENNY R. JOHNSON (23- ) 3612); HAL T. WOODS, SR. (23-3644); STEVEN ) HOLBROOK, obo DONALD HOLBROOK (23- ) 3645); and JERRY HALL (23-3662), ) Respondents. )
Before: KETHLEDGE, NALBANDIAN, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Arch Resources, Inc. and Apogee Coal Company, LLC petition for review
of the Benefits Review Board’s decision that Arch—the former parent corporation of Apogee—is
responsible for paying, to the individual respondents here, benefits owed to them under the Black
Lung Benefits Act. We deny the petitions.
In the 1990s, the miners involved in these consolidated cases worked for Apogee Coal
Company in Kentucky. At that time, Apogee was Arch’s subsidiary. Rather than purchase Nos. 23-3297, et al., Apogee Coal Co., et al. v. OWCP, et al.
commercial insurance, Arch self-insured Apogee against black-lung claims. See 30 U.S.C.
§ 933(a). In 2005, Arch sold Apogee—along with its black-lung liabilities—to Magnum Coal.
Three years later, Patriot Coal acquired Magnum and its subsidiaries, including Apogee. In 2015,
Patriot went bankrupt.
Patriot’s bankruptcy created a problem for the black-lung benefits system. Patriot owned
dozens of subsidiary coal companies whose former employees sought black-lung benefits, so its
bankruptcy could shift hundreds of millions of dollars in black-lung liabilities to the federal
government. See 26 U.S.C. § 9501. As relevant here, however, the Department of Labor instructed
its district directors to hold Arch liable as the responsible insurer for black-lung claims against
Apogee that accrued during the period Arch owned and self-insured Apogee. U.S. Dep’t of Labor,
BLBA Bulletin No. 16-01, 3 (2015).
The miners in these cases applied for black-lung benefits between 2015 and 2017.
Department of Labor district directors granted each miner benefits, and named Apogee the
responsible operator and Arch the responsible insurer. Arch appealed these decisions, arguing that
it had sold Apogee in 2005 and thus was no longer obligated to pay benefits. In each case,
administrative law judges and the Board affirmed the district directors’ decisions. Arch then
petitioned our court for review.
We review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo. Cent. Ohio Coal Co. v. Dir., OWCP,
762 F.3d 483, 488 (6th Cir. 2014). Petitioners argue that the Board erred in holding Arch liable
for black-lung benefits owed by Apogee. But Arch and Apogee concede that they make here the
very same arguments, based on materially identical facts, that we rejected in a published decision
two years ago. See Apogee Coal Co., LLC v. Director, OWCP (Howard), 112 F.4th 343, 353–57
-2- Nos. 23-3297, et al., Apogee Coal Co., et al. v. OWCP, et al.
(6th Cir. 2024). As Arch and Apogee recognize, that decision binds us here. See Petitioner Br.
29. We must therefore deny the petitions.
The petitions for review are denied.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arch-of-ky-llc-v-owcp-ca6-2026.