Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 2026
Docket23-3537
StatusUnpublished

This text of Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP (Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP, (6th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 26a0191n.06

Nos. 23-3297, 23-3437, 23-3536, 23-3537, 23-3541, 23-3612, 23-3644, 23-3645, 23-3662

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

) APOGEE COAL COMPANY, LLC, and ARCH RESOURCES, INC. (23- ) 3297/3541/3612/3644/3645/3662); APOGEE COAL ) FILED COMPANY and ARCH COAL, INC., nka Arch ) Apr 28, 2026 Resources, Inc. (23-3437); ARCH OF KENTUCKY, ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk LLC, and ARCH RESOURCES, INC. (23- ) 3536/3537), ) Petitioners, ) ON PETITION FOR REVIEW ) OF AN ORDER OF THE v. ) BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ ) LABOR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. ) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; RUTLAND ) OPINION MELTON (23-3297); MICHAEL G. CASH (23- 3437); MARY ISON (23-3536/3537); RUSH ) CREECH (23-3541); KENNY R. JOHNSON (23- ) 3612); HAL T. WOODS, SR. (23-3644); STEVEN ) HOLBROOK, obo DONALD HOLBROOK (23- ) 3645); and JERRY HALL (23-3662), ) Respondents. )

Before: KETHLEDGE, NALBANDIAN, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Arch Resources, Inc. and Apogee Coal Company, LLC petition for review

of the Benefits Review Board’s decision that Arch—the former parent corporation of Apogee—is

responsible for paying, to the individual respondents here, benefits owed to them under the Black

Lung Benefits Act. We deny the petitions.

In the 1990s, the miners involved in these consolidated cases worked for Apogee Coal

Company in Kentucky. At that time, Apogee was Arch’s subsidiary. Rather than purchase Nos. 23-3297, et al., Apogee Coal Co., et al. v. OWCP, et al.

commercial insurance, Arch self-insured Apogee against black-lung claims. See 30 U.S.C.

§ 933(a). In 2005, Arch sold Apogee—along with its black-lung liabilities—to Magnum Coal.

Three years later, Patriot Coal acquired Magnum and its subsidiaries, including Apogee. In 2015,

Patriot went bankrupt.

Patriot’s bankruptcy created a problem for the black-lung benefits system. Patriot owned

dozens of subsidiary coal companies whose former employees sought black-lung benefits, so its

bankruptcy could shift hundreds of millions of dollars in black-lung liabilities to the federal

government. See 26 U.S.C. § 9501. As relevant here, however, the Department of Labor instructed

its district directors to hold Arch liable as the responsible insurer for black-lung claims against

Apogee that accrued during the period Arch owned and self-insured Apogee. U.S. Dep’t of Labor,

BLBA Bulletin No. 16-01, 3 (2015).

The miners in these cases applied for black-lung benefits between 2015 and 2017.

Department of Labor district directors granted each miner benefits, and named Apogee the

responsible operator and Arch the responsible insurer. Arch appealed these decisions, arguing that

it had sold Apogee in 2005 and thus was no longer obligated to pay benefits. In each case,

administrative law judges and the Board affirmed the district directors’ decisions. Arch then

petitioned our court for review.

We review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo. Cent. Ohio Coal Co. v. Dir., OWCP,

762 F.3d 483, 488 (6th Cir. 2014). Petitioners argue that the Board erred in holding Arch liable

for black-lung benefits owed by Apogee. But Arch and Apogee concede that they make here the

very same arguments, based on materially identical facts, that we rejected in a published decision

two years ago. See Apogee Coal Co., LLC v. Director, OWCP (Howard), 112 F.4th 343, 353–57

-2- Nos. 23-3297, et al., Apogee Coal Co., et al. v. OWCP, et al.

(6th Cir. 2024). As Arch and Apogee recognize, that decision binds us here. See Petitioner Br.

29. We must therefore deny the petitions.

The petitions for review are denied.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apogee Coal Co. v. OWCP
112 F.4th 343 (Sixth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arch of Ky., LLC v. OWCP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arch-of-ky-llc-v-owcp-ca6-2026.