Arble v. Murray
58 A.2d 143, 359 Pa. 12, 1948 Pa. LEXIS 357
Opinion
This is an action of trespass for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendants. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants for $7,000. We can find no merit in this appeal of the original defendant. The additional defendant did hot appeal. It was necessary to submit the case to the jury. Even defendant’s own testimony suggests his negligence. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned President Judge of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arble v. Murray, 58 A.2d 143, 359 Pa. 12, 1948 Pa. LEXIS 357 (Pa. 1948).
58 A.2d 143 (Arble v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cannon v. Tabor
642 A.2d 1108 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
McKEE BY McKEE v. Evans
551 A.2d 260 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
McErlean v. McCartan
421 A.2d 849 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Henry v. Trabosh
307 A.2d 446 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Davis v. Groner
5 Pa. D. & C.2d 309 (Tioga County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
City of Toledo v. Burks
136 N.E.2d 150 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1955)