Arachy v. Schopen

158 A.2d 604, 22 Conn. Supp. 20, 1960 Conn. Super. LEXIS 92
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided January 19, 1960·No. File No. 118118·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Phillips, J.

Plaintiff was injured when diving off a diving board in defendant’s bathing resort. The second count sounds in nuisance.

The plaintiff obviously was not using the diving board in the exercise of a public right. Dewing v. Old Black Point Assn., 19 Conn. Sup. 230. And there could be no private nuisance, since he was not injured in relation to a right which he enjoyed by [21] reason of Ms ownership of an interest in land. Webel v. Yale University, 125 Conn. 515, 525. There is no merit to the plaintiff’s claim that because he was a licensee he came under the classification of an owner of an interest in land. Bland v. Bregman, 123 Conn. 61, 64.

The demurrer to the second count of the complaint is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arachy v. Schopen, 158 A.2d 604, 22 Conn. Supp. 20, 1960 Conn. Super. LEXIS 92 (Colo. Ct. App. 1960).

158 A.2d 604 (Arachy v. Schopen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kloiber v. Jellen
207 Conn. App. 616 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2021)
Cimino v. Yale University
638 F. Supp. 952 (D. Connecticut, 1986)