Dewing v. Old Black Point Assn.

111 A.2d 29, 19 Conn. Super. Ct. 230, 19 Conn. Supp. 230, 1954 Conn. Super. LEXIS 132
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 13, 1954·No. File 99364·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

King, J.

The second count of the original complaint has been amended by amendments and by a more specific statement, and in its present form purports to allege a cause of action for injuries from a public nuisance.

The plaintiff, a young girl, was a guest at the defendant beach club, and, with its knowledge and acquiescence, was diving from a float or raft which it maintained for the purpose, moored in the public waters of Long Island Sound. The injury occurred because the plaintiff dove into shallow water.

It is true that the plaintiff in swimming in the public waters was exercising a public right. However, the complaint does not allege any interference with her in the exercise of that right. Her right, in so far as it was a public right, was to use the water; not to use the defendant’s raft. Had the injury been caused to her in her enjoyment of a public right by some act or conduct of the defendant, which interfered with the exercise of that right, *231 the plaintiff might well have stated a cause of action. Zatkin v. Katz, 126 Conn. 445, 449; Higgins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 129 Conn. 606, 611. But as the complaint now stands, it does not adequately set forth a cause of action for a public nuisance.

The demurrer to the second count of the complaint as amended and made more specific is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewing v. Old Black Point Assn., 111 A.2d 29, 19 Conn. Super. Ct. 230, 19 Conn. Supp. 230, 1954 Conn. Super. LEXIS 132 (Colo. Ct. App. 1954).

111 A.2d 29 (Dewing v. Old Black Point Assn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B D Molded Prod. v. Vitek Research, No. Cv97 0060362s (Aug. 17, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 9956 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Chenette v. Guilfoil, No. Cv92-040349s (Jan. 21, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 323 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
Gail v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
318 A.2d 804 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1974)
Arachy v. Schopen
158 A.2d 604 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1960)