Arabia v. Zisman

384 A.2d 1110, 157 N.J. Super. 335, 1978 N.J. Super. LEXIS 766
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided March 9, 1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The portions of the judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gruccio in his opinion reported at 143 N. J. Super. 168 (Ch. Div. 1976).

Appellants’ request for an allowance of counsel fees on the appeal is denied. They may, of course, apply for a counsel fee in the trial court when there is “a fund in court” out of which the same may be allowed. See R. 4:42-9(a) (2). No costs to any party on the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arabia v. Zisman, 384 A.2d 1110, 157 N.J. Super. 335, 1978 N.J. Super. LEXIS 766 (N.J. Ct. App. 1978).

384 A.2d 1110 (Arabia v. Zisman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arabia v. Zisman
384 A.2d 1110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)