Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Aquino v. State

Aquino v. State

658 So. 2d 1256, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 1995 WL 509332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aquino v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11121 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 1995·No. No. 95-2488·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion in proper form. We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.

DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aquino v. State, 658 So. 2d 1256, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 1995 WL 509332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 1256 (Aquino v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.