Aquino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aquino v. State

658 So. 2d 1256, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 1995 WL 509332

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 1995

DocketNo. 95-2488

StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 1256 (Aquino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aquino v. State, 658 So. 2d 1256, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 1995 WL 509332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion in proper form. We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.

DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion in proper form. We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.

DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 So. 2d 1256, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9114, 1995 WL 509332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aquino-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.