Aqua Sun Management Inc. v. Divi Time Limited

797 So. 2d 24, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11483, 2001 WL 929863
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 17, 2001
Docket5D00-2873
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 797 So. 2d 24 (Aqua Sun Management Inc. v. Divi Time Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aqua Sun Management Inc. v. Divi Time Limited, 797 So. 2d 24, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11483, 2001 WL 929863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

797 So.2d 24 (2001)

AQUA SUN MANAGEMENT, INC., etc., Appellant,
v.
DIVI TIME LIMITED, etc., Appellee.

No. 5D00-2873.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 17, 2001.
Rehearing Denied October 18, 2001.

R. Michael Kennedy of R. Michael Kennedy, P.A., South Daytona, for Appellant.

Scott W. Cichon of Cobb, Cole & Bell, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Aqua Sun Management, Inc. (Aqua) appeals the trial court's refusal to transfer Divi Time Limited, Inc.'s (Divi) action against it to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. The parties had agreed to that forum selection in an earlier stipulation filed in the federal court.

Divi contends that the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction of its action against Aqua, but that contention is premature and requires determination by the federal court. As a general principle, a trial court must honor a mandatory forum selection clause in a contract in the absence of a showing that the clause is *25 unreasonable or unjust. Management Computer Controls, Inc. v. Charles Perry Const., Inc., 743 So.2d 627, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

The trial court's order is vacated and the matter remanded with instructions to transfer the action in accordance with the parties' earlier stipulation selecting the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, in which to litigate their controversy.

ORDER VACATED; REMANDED.

SHARP, W., PETERSON and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re: Rosewood Private Investments Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
Turnkey Projects Resources v. Gawad
198 So. 3d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Travel Express Investment Inc. v. AT & T Corp.
14 So. 3d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. STEARNS BANK NATL. ASS'N
874 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
797 So. 2d 24, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11483, 2001 WL 929863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aqua-sun-management-inc-v-divi-time-limited-fladistctapp-2001.