Aqua-Chem, Inc., Cleaver-Brooks Division v. National Labor Relations Board

922 F.2d 403, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 173
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 8, 1991·No. 88-2191, 88-2475·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

On September 4,1990, the petitioner filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc. An answer to the petition was requested and response was filed by the National Labor Relations Board on September 27, 1990. All of the judges on the original panel voted to deny a rehearing. A judge in regular active service requested a vote and the majority of the judges voted to deny a rehearing en banc. POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTER-BROOK and MANION, Circuit Judges, voted to grant rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is hereby Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aqua-Chem, Inc., Cleaver-Brooks Division v. National Labor Relations Board, 922 F.2d 403, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 173 (7th Cir. 1991).

922 F.2d 403 (Aqua-Chem, Inc., Cleaver-Brooks Division v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related