Appleman v. Shorewood Realty Corp.
275 A.D.2d 1046
Opinion
In our opinion there were questions -of fact presented which could not be determined on a motion for summary judgment. (Ballen v. Potter, 251 N. Y. 224; Schmidt v. Reed, 132 N. Y. 108; Weinheimer v. Ross, 205 N. Y. 518.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents' and votes to affirm. [See 276 App. Div. 783.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appleman v. Shorewood Realty Corp., 275 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 1046 (Appleman v. Shorewood Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schmidt v. . Reed
30 N.E. 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Weinheimer v. . Ross
99 N.E. 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Ballen v. Potter
167 N.E. 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)