Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 678 F.3d 1314
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 6, 2012·No. 2012-1600.2·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-1600 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 11/06/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wntteb ~tate~ ({ourt of §ppeaI~ . )

for tbe jfeberaI ({trcutt

APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

2012-1600, -1606

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-1846, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

ON MOTION

Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of News Editors, Bloomberg L.P., Dow Jones & Company, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., the New York Times Company, Society of Professional Journalists, and Case: 12-1600 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 11/06/2012

APPLE INC. V SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 2

the Washington Post move for leave to file a brief amicus curIae. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. , FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s19

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.