Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 678 F.3d 1314
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 30, 2012·No. 2012-1507·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1507

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case n0. 12-CV-0630, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM. 0 R D E R

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. move for a Stay, pending appeal, of the preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of . California. Apple Inc. opposes. Samsung replies. Apple Inc. submits a surreply with leave of the court.

APPLE INC. V. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 2

Google Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, L.P. submit amici curiae responses in support of the motion for a stay.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion for a stay pending appeal is held in abey- ance. The temporary stay remains in effect.

FoR THE CoURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Wi1liam C. Price, Esq. ` Josh A. Krevitt, Esq. ' Christopher J. Glancy, Esq. FOH Jonathan N. Zerger, Esq. UEFEDERAL cmcun 88 JuL 3 0 2012

JAN HURBAI.Y CLEBK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.