Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 678 F.3d 1314
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 25, 2012·No. 2012-1506·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-1506 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wntteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~trtutt

APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1506

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-1846, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications Amer- ica, LLC (collectively, "Samsung") move for an unopposed 60-day extension of time to file its opening brief. Case: 12-1506 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2012

APPLE INC. V. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 2

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. Samsung's opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing this order. No further extensions should be anticipated.

FOR THE COURT

SEP 25 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Michael Allen Jacobs, Esq. Kathleen M. Sullivan, Esq. counfb~L u.s.THE FEDERAL CIRCUITFOR s27 SEP 25 t012 JANHORBALV ClERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.