Apple Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 APPLE INC., Case No. 3:21-cv-09078-JD

7 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL v. 8

9 NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, et al., 10 Defendants.

11 12 A hallmark of our federal judiciary is the “strong presumption in favor of access to court 13 records.” Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003); see In re 14 Google Play Store Antitrust Litig., 556 F. Supp. 3d 1106, 1107 (N.D. Cal. 2021). Public access 15 maintains confidence in the fair and impartial administration of justice, and protects the integrity 16 and independence of the courts. This is why the business of the federal judiciary is done in open 17 court. 18 In limited circumstances, there may be grounds for curtailing public access. This is an 19 exception to the rule, and so a party requesting that a document or evidence be sealed from the 20 public needs to present a good reason explaining why. A compelling reason supported by specific 21 facts is needed before the Court will consider sealing records involving dispositive motions. See 22 Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 2006); DZ Rsrv. v. 23 Facebook, Inc., No. 18-cv-04978-JD, 2021 WL 75734, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2021). Cursory 24 assertions of confidentiality are not enough, and the “fact that the parties may have designated a 25 document as confidential under a stipulated protective order is also not enough to justify sealing.” 26 In re Google Play Store, 556 F. Supp. 3d at 1107. 27 NSO has made a number of sealing requests in connection with a motion to dismiss the 1 are based on NSO representations that the material to be sealed are subject to similar treatment by 2 || courts in Israel. The Court has denied the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 87, and grants the sealing 3 || requests based primarily on comity for the Israeli courts. This order is without prejudice to 4 || whether the documents should be unsealed at a party or nonparty’s request at a later date. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: January 23, 2024 7 8 JAME NATO 9 Unitedftates District Judge 10 11 a 12

15 16

Zz 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28