Appeal of Town of Conway

430 A.2d 154, 121 N.H. 372
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 7, 1981
DocketNo. 80-372
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 430 A.2d 154 (Appeal of Town of Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Town of Conway, 430 A.2d 154, 121 N.H. 372 (N.H. 1981).

Opinion

[373]*373Memorandum

This is an appeal by the Town of Conway from the July 31, 1980 order of the New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board certifying certain members of the Conway Police Department as a bargaining unit under RSA 273-A:8 I. The board excluded from the unit five part-time patrolmen, the chief, a lieutenant, and a detective sergeant. It included in the unit three sergeants and ten patrolmen, five of whom were probationary employees. The town argues that the probationary employees should not have been included within the unit. We agree.

RSA 273-A:8 I requires the board to certify a bargaining unit with at least ten employees. For purposes of this section, the board has interpreted “employees” to mean positions, and it will certify a unit if there are ten positions within an organization even if, as in this case, some of those positions are held by probationary employees. That interpretation, however, is contrary to the plain language of the statute. RSA 273-A:l IX(d) expressly excludes “[p]ersons in a probationary or temporary status” from the definition of “public employee.” That definition applies to the word “employee” as it is used in RSA 273-A:8 I. “[WJords used with plain meaning in one part of ... [a statute] are to be given the same meaning in other parts of . . . [the statute], unless a contrary intention is clearly shown.” Dupont v. Chagnon, 119 N.H. 792, 794, 408 A.2d 408, 409 (1979) (quoting Appalachian Mountain Club v. Meredith, 103 N.H. 5, 16, 163 A.2d 808, 815-16 (1960)).

Because the statute specifically excludes probationary employees from the definition of “public employee,” the board erred in including probationary employees in the bargaining unit for the purpose of determining whether the requisite number of employees existed. Cf. In re Nashua Ass’n of School Principals, 119 N.H. 90, 92, 398 A.2d 832, 833-34 (1979); Keene State College Educ. Ass’n v. State, 119 N.H. 1, 3, 396 A.2d 1099, 1101 (1979). Without those five probationary employees, the police department has an insufficient number of employees to be certified as a bargaining unit under RSA 273-A:8 I.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Town of Deerfield
34 A.3d 734 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2011)
Appeal of International Brotherhood of Police Officers
804 A.2d 431 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2002)
Appeal of Denton
786 A.2d 845 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 A.2d 154, 121 N.H. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-town-of-conway-nh-1981.