Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Apice v. Apice

Apice v. Apice

137 So. 3d 1077, 2014 WL 1092199, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 2014
DocketNo. 3D13-3194
StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 3d 1077 (Apice v. Apice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Apice v. Apice, 137 So. 3d 1077, 2014 WL 1092199, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Martinez v. Kurt, 45 So.3d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Toiberman v. Tisera, 998 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toiberman v. Tisera
998 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Martinez v. Kurt
45 So. 3d 961 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 3d 1077, 2014 WL 1092199, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apice-v-apice-fladistctapp-2014.