Antunez v. Propipe Corporation
This text of 248 S.W.3d 635 (Antunez v. Propipe Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jose Antunez (Claimant) appeals the temporary total disability award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the administrative law judge’s award and decision, which found that Claimant is permanently partially disabled; Propipe Corporation (Employer) is hable for past medical expenses but not future medical treatment; Employer is ha-ble for temporary total disability benefits; and the Second Injury Fund is not liable for permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 S.W.3d 635, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 412, 2008 WL 821002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antunez-v-propipe-corporation-moctapp-2008.