Allen Ex Rel. Pearson v. West Belle Partnership, L.P.

248 S.W.3d 635, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 411, 2008 WL 821001
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2008·No. ED 89950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laneisha Allen (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment setting aside the default judgment against West Belle Partnership, L.P. (Respondent) in a suit seeking damages for personal injuries she sustained on Respondent’s premises. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen Ex Rel. Pearson v. West Belle Partnership, L.P., 248 S.W.3d 635, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 411, 2008 WL 821001 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

248 S.W.3d 635 (Allen Ex Rel. Pearson v. West Belle Partnership, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Antunez v. Propipe Corporation
248 S.W.3d 635 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)