Antonsky v. City Dye House

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Antonsky v. City Dye House

123 N.W. 56, 109 Minn. 96, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 423

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 12, 1909·No. Nos. 16,088—(8)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BROWN, J.

From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court, [97]*97upon application of defendant, made an order transferring the cause to Hennepin county. Plaintiff appealed from that order.

The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539; Allis v. White, 59 Minn. 97, 60 N. W. 809.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, J.

From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court, [97]*97upon application of defendant, made an order transferring the cause to Hennepin county. Plaintiff appealed from that order.

The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539; Allis v. White, 59 Minn. 97, 60 N. W. 809.

Appeal dismissed.

Antonsky v. City Dye House, 123 N.W. 56, 109 Minn. 96, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 423 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

123 N.W. 56 (Antonsky v. City Dye House) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related