Antonsky v. City Dye House
This text of 123 N.W. 56 (Antonsky v. City Dye House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court, [97]*97upon application of defendant, made an order transferring the cause to Hennepin county. Plaintiff appealed from that order.
The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539; Allis v. White, 59 Minn. 97, 60 N. W. 809.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 N.W. 56, 109 Minn. 96, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonsky-v-city-dye-house-minn-1909.