Allis v. White

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Allis v. White

60 N.W. 809, 59 Minn. 97, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 117

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 12, 1894·No. No. 8923·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial, on the ground that defendant, at the time of the commencement of the action, resided, and still resides, in the county to which he asks to have the case removed, and not in the county in which the action is brought. Held, [99] following Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539, that this order is not appealable, and this appeal should be dismissed. So ordered.

Gilfillan, C. J., took no part.

(Opinion published 60 N. W. 809.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial, on the ground that defendant, at the time of the commencement of the action, resided, and still resides, in the county to which he asks to have the case removed, and not in the county in which the action is brought. Held, [99] following Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539, that this order is not appealable, and this appeal should be dismissed. So ordered.

Gilfillan, C. J., took no part.

(Opinion published 60 N. W. 809.)

Allis v. White, 60 N.W. 809, 59 Minn. 97, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 117 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

60 N.W. 809 (Allis v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related