Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company

Fifth Circuit

Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company

614 F.2d 1083

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 1, 1980

Docket78-2402

StatusPublished

This text of 614 F.2d 1083 (Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company, 614 F.2d 1083 (5th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 570 (5th Cir. 1979).

In addition to the attorney’s fees heretofore allowed, the District Court shall award the Appellee a reasonable attorney’s fee for this appeal. See Christianburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 417, 98 S.Ct. 694, 697, 54 L.Ed.2d 648, 654 (1978).

2

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI