Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company

614 F.2d 1083
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 1, 1980·No. 78-2402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 570 (5th Cir. 1979).

In addition to the attorney’s fees heretofore allowed, the District Court shall award the Appellee a reasonable attorney’s fee for this appeal. See Christianburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 417, 98 S.Ct. 694, 697, 54 L.Ed.2d 648, 654 (1978).

2

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company, 614 F.2d 1083 (5th Cir. 1980).

614 F.2d 1083 (Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related