Antonio J. Hamilton v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
DocketA15D0202
StatusPublished

This text of Antonio J. Hamilton v. State (Antonio J. Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Antonio J. Hamilton v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 14, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0202. ANTONIO J. HAMILTON v. THE STATE.

After pleading guilty to theft by deception, Antonio J. Hamilton filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal. The trial court denied the motion on May 1, 2014.

Hamilton allegedly did not receive the trial court’s order, and he filed a motion to set aside the ruling. The trial court denied the motion to set aside on November 17,

2014, and Hamilton filed this application for discretionary appeal on December 19, 2014.

The order at issue may be appealed directly.1 Ordinarily, if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d)

& (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Because Hamilton filed his application 32 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, it is untimely.

1 When a trial court fails to timely provide an order to an aggrieved party, that party may file a motion to have the order vacated and re-entered to begin anew the time for filing an appeal. See Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980). Such a motion is authorized by OCGA § 9-11-60 (g). See id; Crawford v. Kroger Co., 183 Ga. App. 836 (360 SE2d 274) (1987). Because the motion is not made pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), no application for discretionary appeal is required to appeal a trial court’s order denying such a motion. See id. The application is thus DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 01/14/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cambron v. Canal Insurance
269 S.E.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Crawford v. Kroger Company
360 S.E.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Hill v. State
420 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Antonio J. Hamilton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonio-j-hamilton-v-state-gactapp-2015.