Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank

DecidedMarch 30, 2021

DocketA21D0243

StatusPublished

This text of Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank (Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 30, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0243. ANTONETTE FERRELL-GREEN v. MIDFIRST BANK.

Plaintiff MidFirst Bank filed this post-foreclosure dispossessory action against defendants Antonette Ferrell-Green and Tony Ware in the magistrate court. The case was transferred to the superior court with the parties’ consent. On March 2, 2021, the superior court entered an order directing the defendants to pay rent pending a final disposition of the case. On March 8, 2021, the pro se defendants filed an application for discretionary review to obtain review of the rent order1. As a general rule, a right of direct appeal lies from a final judgment, where the case is no longer pending below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Here, the rent order was not a final judgment, and the case remains pending in the superior court. Consequently, the defendants were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to obtain appellate review. See Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc., 172 Ga. App. 115, 116 (3) (322 SE2d 108) (1984). See also Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991) (discretionary application statute does not relieve applicant who seeks to appeal interlocutory order from complying with interlocutory review requirements). Their failure to do so requires dismissal of this application for lack of jurisdiction.

1 The applicants also filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order. That appeal has been docketed in this Court as Case No. A21A1186. See Grantham v. Nelson, 160 Ga. App. 68 (286 SE2d 59) (1981). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/30/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 30, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0243. ANTONETTE FERRELL-GREEN v. MIDFIRST BANK.

Plaintiff MidFirst Bank filed this post-foreclosure dispossessory action against defendants Antonette Ferrell-Green and Tony Ware in the magistrate court. The case was transferred to the superior court with the parties’ consent. On March 2, 2021, the superior court entered an order directing the defendants to pay rent pending a final disposition of the case. On March 8, 2021, the pro se defendants filed an application for discretionary review to obtain review of the rent order1. As a general rule, a right of direct appeal lies from a final judgment, where the case is no longer pending below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Here, the rent order was not a final judgment, and the case remains pending in the superior court. Consequently, the defendants were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to obtain appellate review. See Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc., 172 Ga. App. 115, 116 (3) (322 SE2d 108) (1984). See also Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991) (discretionary application statute does not relieve applicant who seeks to appeal interlocutory order from complying with interlocutory review requirements). Their failure to do so requires dismissal of this application for lack of jurisdiction.

1 The applicants also filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order. That appeal has been docketed in this Court as Case No. A21A1186. See Grantham v. Nelson, 160 Ga. App. 68 (286 SE2d 59) (1981). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/30/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Antonette Ferrell-Green v. Midfirst Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antonette-ferrell-green-v-midfirst-bank-gactapp-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack